4 thoughts on “How To Be Heard and Make Change in a Local Democracy

  1. “Use the System” good advice if the system actually listened! Open houses and public meetings are only a tick mark in the box of the Gantt chart of the project.

    Tell me Jeff when did active ‘using the system’ actually work on the big projects or even a small one when the politician or developer is determined. In Cobourg we had a full session of public participation on “Governance” the participants used the system to say that the changes proposed were not good ones – guess what, the final result never differed from the first proposal written by the Staff.

    Honestly you have been watching the latest debate in Cobourg about a nine-storey building being proposed to be built next to Victoria Hall do you really think, knowing the system as you do, that the objectors stand a chance against the Ford picked LTB ands a determined developer?

    Just my two cents worth
    ben

    1. Hey Ben,

      If you’re looking to use the system to stop development, just remember that people are (mostly) allowed to do what they want with their own land. The law is in favour of the developer because the developer’s rights are no different from anyone else’s, and when it comes to their own land their rights trump anyone else’s (as would yours, if you wanted to develop your land – or to choose not to). The system is designed to uphold the same standard for everyone, and yet allows council to make exceptions that are reasonable or within the public interest.

      But the first step in “using the system” is talking to your representative. In the only example of Brighton council turning down a development proposal, I spoke to residents who were opposed to it and gave them advice on how to present their concerns; they took those suggestions to heart and were highly organized, respectful, and effective. Council denied the development proposal. But ultimately, the number one concern expressed was that the development would “alter the character of the neighbourhood”, and that was what was on the motion, but that wasn’t the opinion of our own planners. Ultimately that was also not considered a valid reason by the Ontario Land Tribunal, which not only overruled council but also made us pay the developer’s legal costs, because the character of the neighbourhood is considered of lesser value than the right of a property owner to do what they want with their own land. (Sadly, the ecological concerns that motivated me, and that I spoke about at length, were not considered at all because they are not a criteria considered under the Planning Act.) On the whole, the movement against this development was made much stronger for having contacted their councillors directly and in advance, but the outcome was still determined by the law and the lawfulness of the application, as it should be. Public engagement opportunities are not a communal veto system, and yet that often seems to be how residents see it; my hope here was that people would know that they can just call me first, and I’ll be able to help temper expectations and direct them toward more beneficial and less frustrating approaches.

      I would also love to see residents engage in matters other than just opposition to development. It’s like pulling teeth to get people to offer input into the Strategic Plan, which is probably the most consequential thing any of us can do; and we’re usually very happy to get a hundred responses to a survey for something like our Integrated Community Sustainability Plan, which is perhaps the most important document to shape our community’s future. My hope with this post was to highlight that we’re capable of doing things other than just opposing what others do, and that council can help residents make new things happen.

  2. Speaking for those of us who do not enjoy town water, sanitary and storm infrastructure I would dearly like to understand where the funding comes from to reconstruct not the roads we all use, but the sanitary water and storm drains and supply under them. If these are funded by water rates I would like to know where I can find the documentation showing this. Sorry you get so few queries, for most things are running very well. we who are on holding tanks can’t even dump our waste in Brighton which would be very hurtful if we are paying for others services. Thank you for listening.

    1. Thanks for engaging Dave! I’m very relieved to hear that things are going well, that’s excellent 🙂

      Water and wastewater rates are a whole separate section in our budget, and the bulk of the cost of the new wastewater treatment plant is being paid by the province through a grant. So some of your provincial taxes will be paying for this upgrade, but none of your property taxes. We’ll be starting our budgeting process for 2026 soon, so watch for that. I’ll write a post here laying out the exact numbers for this coming year.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Jeff Wheeldon

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading